Back in the day, culture was something you became exposed to when you traveled to a foreign country. And employee performance was as easy to manage as uttering the words, “work harder or you’re fired!”
But modern employees and workplaces are far more complex. Counterintuitive management theories now tell us that annual reviews do more harm than good, and people must make space during the day for naps and meditation to enhance productivity. Below are five recent articles that offer seemingly strange advice, backed up by research and facts, that explain how you’re doing it wrong:
By: Carey Dunne
Overwork is a serious problem, causing stress, physical ailments and eventual burnout. The counterintuitive solution touted by the anti-workaholics is a 20 hour work week, but is that really the answer? Not everyone is Darwin or Dickens, after all.
Actually, yes! One study from Illinois Institute of Technology found that scientists who worked 25 hours per week were no more productive than those who worked 1/5 of that time. Full-time scientists were half as productive as those working 20 hours a week, while those who worked 60 hours per week were the least productive of all. Read to the end for the inspiring stories of “slackers” like Charles Dickens, mathematician G.H. Hardy, and Nobel Laureate, Thomas Mann.
By: Minda Zetlin
We are taught that nothing great can be achieved without diligence and hard work, and even then there’s no guarantee. So why is Michael Lewis, the bestselling author of Moneyball and The Big Short, extolling the virtues of laziness?
It seems that our culture glorifies busy while leisure time is seen as a nice-to-have. But Lewis is comfortable with periods of inactivity if nothing worthwhile is capturing his attention. Staying busy can be a distraction, stealing our attention when a worthwhile endeavor or idea does come along. “My laziness serves as a filter,” Lewis said. “Something has to be really good before I’ll decide to work on it.”
By: Ariel Bogle
Bogle doesn’t pull any punches here, and basically calls out the folly of writing about your workplace culture when dark secrets lurk in the background. Most large tech companies have low numbers of women in leadership roles, and ethnic and racial diversity is abysmal. Add to the mix that many of these so-called cultures have negative reputations for being ruthless, overly-competitive, and guilty of gender-based harrassment.
“Culture” is an overused buzzword that is being wrongfully usurped because companies think it’s a topic they need to cover. (Take this post for example.) But businesses must earn the right to claim culture as an asset. According to HR consultant, Natasha Hawker:
People know at the moment they need to talk about culture — it’s a sexy word — but I don’t think people define culture the same way. A good workplace is one with strong communication — a diverse, flexible business where wins are celebrated.
By: Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic & Adam Yearsley
I did not know this, but McKinsey coined the phrase, “war for talent” in 1998 and declared that success would depend on how well companies could attract, develop, and retain talented employees. The authors of this piece are calling the war a universal loss, because for every successful and satisfied employee, there are scores of folks who are underemployed or hate their jobs.
Maybe that’s why at least half of the modern workforce are passive jobseekers, and so many are willing to take pay-cuts and step into the unknown in exchange for the freedom and flexibility that comes with freelancing.
In this lose/lose job market, companies complain about talent shortages and employees complain about pointless jobs. The authors suggest that employers can improve how they measure performance and understand talent. They should shift the focus from leadership development to developing employees and teams, and up-leveling the entire organization.
Even Harvard Business Review is taking some shots at traditional notions of hard work. In this case, the lesson is to turn off and tune out. Authors like Ta-Nehishi Coates and JK Rowling, and psychiatrist Carl Jung all have rituals for managing the constant flow of information and cultivating quiet time.
Research shows that these practices restore the nervous system and condition our minds to be more adaptive to complex workplace environments. This article is loaded with supporting research too, like how “Duke Medical School’s Imke Kirste recently found that silence is associated with the development of new cells in the hippocampus, the key brain region associated with learning and memory”.
So that’s what the experts are saying. What do you think? Is your culture ready for drastic changes in the amount of hours employees are seated at their desks? Will you encourage punctuating periods of productivity with laziness and quiet time?
David Mizne is Marketing Communications Manager at 15Five, continuous performance management software that includes weekly check-ins, objectives (OKR) tracking, peer recognition, 1-on-1s, and reviews. David’s articles have appeared on The Next Web & TalentCulture. Follow him @davidmizne.
Some of the world's most successful businesses use 15Five to maintain a healthy company culture. Learn How!